Like I Said, Spinach Isn’t the Culprit
A couple of weeks ago, I wrote Spinach Isn’t the Culprit, and referred to Nina Planck’s NYT Op-ed, which explains how to reduce the risk of E. coli (change the cows’ diet from grain to grass and hay for a week prior to slaughtering them). And yesterday, as if that original article never existed, Libby Sander of the NYT reports in Source of Deadly E. Coli Is Found, that, shocker, it came from the cow operations. Somehow (that part’s a bit fuzzy).
What I’m surprised by, is why anyone’s surprised that feeding cows an unnatural diet (grain rather than forage), keeping them in conditions that are unnatural, and trying treat all of their waste before it ends up in the water, wouldn’t be a recipe for all kinds of disaster.
And what completely confounds me, is why anyone would want to eat the product of all that? What part of that sounds healthy or wholesome, or . . . sane?
Though it’s tempting to say, "Wow, that is gross. I’ll avoid all that by buying free-range beef," there is another consideration. Even on the off chance that the producer you purchase from really is free-range and the cows are allowed to spend some time outdoors,
If you want to do what’s best for your health, the environment, the animals, and perhaps most important, your karma, I see no viable alternative. Eating meat has no upside, other than, for some of us, a charred, medium-rare filet mignon medallion can be yummy (did I lose at least half of you with that last detail?). But once your brain kicks in and recognizes the taste as flesh and blood, however, the yumminess quickly disappears.
Bon appetit!
Bon appetit! you're right. But alot of people I have spoken with don't care about animals, don't think they feel anything and have no interest in being anything other than a consumer, and keeping the machine moving forward. If thousands died from e. coli and the link to factory farms couldn't be blurred then perhaps the profit madness would end. Maybe farm welfare should be ended as well.