Does Anyone Want Abolitionist Literature?
I’m doing an informal survey regarding leaflets, pamphlets, and the like. I know there is ambivalence about what is available, and I was wondering if an abolitionist pamphlet would appeal to anyone. (And after I do this, I’m retiring The A-Word again.)
I’ve previously written that I had an abolitionist impulse and was a vegetarian prior to college (I didn’t stop eating products like muffins and scones, made with eggs or milk or butter). But when I got to college I was bombarded with Peter Singer and information about reducing suffering and cruelty, and my abolitionist limb atrophied and disappeared. I always wonder if things would have gone differently if I had been bombarded with abolitionist literature.
I’ve asked a handful of people already, and I was surprised to learn that 80% question the need and/or effectiveness of pamphlets in 2007. Perhaps something downloadable to phones or other hand helds would be more appropriate. Then there are the environmental concerns of all that paper and ink, and many of the pamphlets will end up in the garbage.
What do you think?
And here’s the clincher: I’m happy to design, write it, and give you a disk, but you’d print out what you need when you need them. (There’s no way I’m adding "pamphlet producer and distributor" to the myriad things I have to get done in a day. I wouldn’t want to promise something I don’t think I could deliver on.).
I have no idea what the length of the piece would be (although I don’t think it would be as long as the one available from Friends of Animals, which I like and has a lot of recipes, and that’s where the length comes from), but I can say that the content would be largely based on Gary Francione‘s theory, and he would look it over. I wouldn’t want to spend time to develop something that activists either don’t have a need for or wouldn’t use for other reasons. Maybe a pamphlet that included the health and environment reasons why we shouldn’t use animals would be more appropriate. I don’t know.
Finally, please ask your activist friends and take an informal survey of your own and get back to me. I know that I’m not a favorite in some circles, and some of my decisions have been, shall we say, unpopular, but try to look beyond that. Is this a good idea for you and the way you do your own activism? Is there a better, more appropriate medium for the average college student?
I appreciate any constructive advice.
Grazie mille.
I think this is a great idea. Another blogger (thestartingpointisveganism.blogspot.com) and I are working on abolitionist pamphlets, although with a particularly Canadian spin.
I would love it! I am a beginner activist, and the only one in my area, it seems. Any help is much appreciated. Thanks so much for your blog. I often wish I could get your words out to the general public.
Oh…and hear is a link to my video "ChickenBear's Lullaby" for your chuckle of the day.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tvs_hzPP4_c
Sheila that is ADORABLE!
I like the Vegan Starter Guide from Friends of Animals.
Unlike most guides, it actually uses the word "vegan" on the front. The only downfall is that it contains no pictures of animal exploitation. I definitely don't think we need to fill the guide from front to back with horrible pictures of animal slaughter, but I do think a few to accompany the text would be effective.
For those of you who do not know much about FOA, they present a clear abolitionist view of animal rights and actively denounce welfarist thinking and campaigning.
Three articles from their website illustrate my point:
– http://www.friendsofanimals.org/programs/animal-rights/index.html
– http://www.friendsofanimals.org/programs/vegetarianism/revolutionary-veganism.html
– http://www.friendsofanimals.org/programs/vegetarianism/sustainable-tall-tales.php
Brandon,
I'm a big fan of the Friends of Animals booklet, but for me it's too long and I could do without the recipes. I agree about photos, however I'm trying to create a document that anyone can print inexpensively, from their home computers, even. When I think about photos, I then think about paper and I'm trying not to put myself in a position where people say, "I'd love to use that, but the paper is so expensive" or "I'd love to use that but my computer doesn't print good photos." I'm in a bit of a spot as I want to do something useful, but I'm getting mixed messages about what that is. I do appreciate your valuable input.
Groups I have worked with could certainly use your pamphlet. I am really at odds when it comes to pamphlets since they are all (lets be honest) welfare focused. The movement *needs* abolitionist lierature. I am currently working on a vegan pamphlet that I have sent to you in order to look over – let me know what youthink of it.
Also, If we could set up some way for abolitionists to post pamphlets thwy have made somewhere so that everyone could print and use them ….? Could your blog incorporate something similar?
Joey
Mary, I do most of my activism via computer and don't have much need for leaflets, but I think abolitionist literature is a good idea for those who will use it. I've come across some pamphlets I would never hand out (even in a demonstation) because they incorporate the language of animal exploitation. For example, welfarists (like HSUS and PeTA) confuse euthanasia with institutional killing– from what I understand HSUS was even offering a course on it. And breeders speak of "purebreds", a term which I think derives from proto-racism. So I think we need a whole new language that supports abolition.
And Brandon, I especially like Friends of Animal's answer to "What is meant by animal rights?" because it explains that moral consideration is not based on a level of intelligence (as neither on beauty, usefulness, or concept of moral duties). Having read Steven Wise' suggestion that animals be given some sort of IQ test, which would exclude some animals the way these tests exclude some people, I think it's important this be stated.
Ellie,
Sentience will be what I rely on, however I would like to say: these are the various reasons you can be for or against animal rights (like I mentioned in my blog today, about the Omnivore's Dilemma), and they can all be quickly turned upside down. The only one that can't, and that has science behind it and the facts are in, is sentience. We have more knowledge about nonhumans than ever before, and as knowledge progresses, so should morality. I actually joked with someone yesterday about calling it: Animal Rights: The Un-PETA Approach, and she said that people would take it just because it says that! My tentative title looks like this:
Animal Rights
What it is
What it isn't
Why it's important for Planet Earth
Why it's important for YOU!
Actually, that looks hideous. It looks much better on the page. Thanks for your input.